Paula reviews 'Daughter
of Pendle' by Rowan Scot-Ryder
This story is set in the early 17th century in Lancashire in
the north west of England. Anyone who has grown up in this area (like me) knows
the story of the ‘Pendle Witches’, a group of women who were found guilty of
witchcraft and hanged.
Pendle Hill is a long, low hill about 1,800 feet high which
dominates the landscape of the eastern part of the county. In the 17th century,
it was covered with more forests than today, and was surrounded by small
villages, some with less than a dozen cottages. The area was said to be wild
and lawless, and superstition was rife. Anyone who was ‘different’ was open to
suspicion, including those who mixed potions of herbal remedies for the poor
families who had no recourse to any other medical help.
In addition, King James I, convinced that he was being
plotted against by witches, enacted a law imposing the death penalty on any
practitioners of witchcraft or the ‘magical arts’. Of course, the local
justices of the peace were only too anxious to obey the king’s demands and,
hopefully, to earn promotion by doing so.
As Rowan says in her introduction to the story, history is written
by the accusers, and not the accused i.e. in this case, the official record of
the trial. Rowan, however, looks at the ‘other’ side of
the story, mainly through the eyes of eleven-year-old Jennet Devize.
When her family was accused of witchcraft, Jennet stood up in the crowded court
room at Lancaster Assizes, and denounced them all. History has portrayed her as
a vindictive child from an abusive family – but is there another explanation?
Blurb:
Jennet Devize is the last of the Demdike clan, and a true
daughter of Pendle.
Known for centuries as the child of witches, she spoke
against her whole family at the Lancaster Assizes in 1612, condemning them to
death. What was the truth behind her betrayal? What happened after the trials?
Could she build a life and be loved, become a mother and a
healer, or would the accusation of witchcraft follow her forever?
This story was a fascinating
glimpse of Jennet’s family and the events leading up to the trial, as well as
the aftermath for Jennet during the next 25 years, based both on fact and also
on Rowan’s vivid, but very believable, imagination. I felt I got to know the
characters well, and I was transported back to the days when belief in
witchcraft was very strong. And, believe me, the last line of dialogue will
bring goosebumps to every reader who has heard or read anything about 17th
century accusations of witchcraft .
Now I need to know what the last line of dialogue is!
ReplyDeleteGreat review!
I'm saying nothing! You'll have to read it! :-)
DeleteAs you probably know I'm not into historical novels but this has certainly caught my interest.
ReplyDeleteI'm not usually into historicals either (despite or maybe because I'm an historian) - but this is very different from the pirates, rakes, and dukes that abound in many so-called historicals! It's based on fact and has been well researched. Definitely worth reading, Margaret!
DeleteWell you've definitely teased us with that hint about the last line of dialogue, haven't you now?! :)
ReplyDeleteIt was the line that made my blood run cold, which maybe shows how immersed I became in the story!
DeleteI love historicals and I'm fascinated by how women were unjustly accused of witchcraft. Looking forward to reading this one!
ReplyDeleteHope you enjoy it, Jen! I think it shows the injustice of the accusations of witchcraft here in 17th century England, and it's far more believable than the 'official' records dating from this time.
DeleteI have no idea if this is accurate or not, but I remember learning that there were many actual things that caused women to hallucinate, etc., including consuming the rye seed.
DeleteNot heard of that, but the so-called 'witches' here were usually what we might now call eccentrics - women who lived on their own with half a dozen cats, or who dispensed herbal remedies, or even those suffering from what we now recognise as Alzheimer's or another form of dementia.
DeleteInteresting. And sad.
DeleteAgree but it was the age they lived in. Superstition was rife. In the Middle Ages, suspected witches were thrown into a local lake attached to a large boulder. If they sank and drowned, they were innocent; if they didn't they were guilty. Catch 22!
DeleteOh I know. And today, I'm not sure there's that much of a difference in some of the women's issues. Except for the boulder thing. :)
DeleteI definitely enjoyed a look at the "other side of the coin" as shared by Rowan in this book. We so often only see one side of an issue and take it as truth when there is usually part of the story we don't know. Just think of all of us who talk to ourselves, our pets, and are a bit eccentric at times. We would all be counted as witches were the superstitions still in control.
ReplyDeleteGood point, Rebecca! I'm sure everyone would think I was an old witch! LOL!
DeleteDefinitely sounds intriguing!!
ReplyDeleteIt really is, Vicki, and you don't have to know the 'historical' story already to enjoy Rowan's interpretation of the events.
DeleteI thoroughly recommend this book. As Paula states the last line gave me goosebumps
ReplyDeleteI think everyone who has read it gets a jolt at the end!
Delete